Earnings call: IDW Media anticipates growth with IP focus in Q3 report

IDW Media Holdings (IDWM), in its Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2024 earnings call, outlined a promising future backed by strategic restructuring and a focus on intellectual property (IP). CEO Davidi Jonas and CFO Andrew DeBaker discussed the company’s financial performance, highlighting a significant revenue contribution from non-Penguin Random House (PRH) sources, such as Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) orders for popular titles. Despite a strong quarter, the company’s market valuation did not mirror the positive financial indicators, with management pointing to undervalued IP assets as the key to future growth.

Key Takeaways

IDW Media Holdings predicts cash recoupment from “Wynonna Earp” between $100,000 to $150,000 in Q4 2024 and $400,000 to $500,000 for the full year 2025.
Non-PRH revenue accounted for 15-20% of total revenue, driven by orders for titles like “Sonic” and “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.”
PRH revenue share decreased to 70% in Q3 from 80% in previous periods.
The company has undergone significant restructuring, now focusing on growth and long-term shareholder value.
CEO Davidi Jonas is dedicating substantial time to cash flow management and expanding value opportunities.
The company raised $3 million for strategic investments and to enhance financial security.

Company Outlook

IDW Media Holdings is implementing a “shrink, fix, and grow” strategy, aiming to leverage high-value licenses and new IP ventures.
Management sees real long-term value in the company’s IP, which is currently undervalued by the market.
There is optimism for future engagement with investors and the company’s growth trajectory.

Bearish Highlights

The market has not positively responded to the company’s increased cash reserves and strong financial year.
Future licensing opportunities, particularly for key franchises like Ninja Turtles and Sonic, are not guaranteed for renewal.

Bullish Highlights

Management expressed confidence in the company’s financial position and the potential of its IP assets.
The recent capital raise of $3 million is expected to support strategic initiatives and risk-taking for growth.

Misses

The company acknowledged that ambitious targets set by the Board may not fully align with current market conditions.

Q&A Highlights

CEO Jonas reiterated the company’s focus on profitability and IP value, which he believes the market undervalues.
The discussion emphasized ongoing efforts to engage with investors and set the stage for future discussions on the company’s direction.

In summary, IDW Media Holdings, with a current staff of about 50 employees, is poised for expansion, focusing on its IP for long-term value despite market undervaluation. The management’s strategy and optimism, coupled with a strong quarter and strategic capital raise, suggest a forward-looking approach for the company’s operations and shareholder interests.

InvestingPro Insights

As IDW Media Holdings (IDWM) continues to navigate through its restructuring phase with an eye on leveraging its intellectual property, InvestingPro data and tips provide additional context to the company’s financial health and market performance.

InvestingPro Data:

The stock has experienced high price volatility, which may reflect investor uncertainty about the company’s future profitability and IP valuation.

IDW Media Holdings’ gross profit margins are considered weak, indicating that the company may be facing challenges in converting sales into profits efficiently.

The company’s valuation suggests a poor free cash flow yield, which could raise concerns about its ability to generate sufficient cash to support operations and strategic initiatives.

InvestingPro Tips:

Analysts are not expecting IDW Media Holdings to be profitable this year, aligning with the company’s own admission of ambitious targets that may not fully match current market conditions.

The company’s share price has seen a significant decline over the past five years, yet there has been a strong return over the last month, hinting at a potential shift in investor sentiment.

For readers interested in a deeper dive into the company’s prospects, there are additional InvestingPro Tips available at https://www.investing.com/pro/IDWM, which can offer further guidance on investment decisions related to IDW Media Holdings.

Full transcript – IDW Media Holdings Inc B (IDW) Q3 2024:

Operator: Greetings. Welcome to the IDW Media Holdings Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2024 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Davidi Jonas, CEO; and Andrew DeBaker, CFO, will be available to answer questions and provide a company insight. Please note, this conference is being recorded. Before we begin, I’d like to review the company’s abbreviated safe harbor statement. I’d like to remind you that statements made during this conference call concerning future revenues, results from operations, financial position, markets, economic conditions, product releases, partnerships and any other statement that may be construed as a prediction of future performance or events are forward-looking statements, which may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Non-GAAP results will also be discussed on the call. The company believes the presentation of non-GAAP information provides useful supplementary data concerning the company’s ongoing operations and is provided for informational purposes only. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]

Q – Daniel Seyde: Hi. Thanks for taking my question. How much cash do you expect to recoup from Wynonna Earp in the fourth quarter and also full year 2025?

Davidi Jonas: Were you talking about to fourth quarter of ’24 and fiscal ’25?

Daniel Seyde: Correct.

Andrew DeBaker: And this is Andrew to respond. And just to be clear, you’re referring to like the recruitment that we’re getting on a quarterly basis, correct?

Daniel Seyde: Correct, the recruitment of the cash outlays?

Davidi Jonas: Yes. So we know – we work obviously with Cineplex, I mean they do give us reporting. And we do know the amount roughly over the life of the contracts, many of which they just renewed this past April, generally three year contracts. We get paid when they get paid. So it can be a little bit of hit or miss, right? So last quarter, we only received about 7,000 – and this quarter, we just reported, what, like $250, I believe, $250 and change. So next quarter – we basically assume every quarter we’re going to get somewhere in the $100,000 range. It’s just for internal purposes, right, because it can be a little bit hit or miss timing-wise. So for what it’s worth, I would say, likely in the fourth quarter, somewhere between maybe 100 and 150 knowing that I could be off on that obviously. And then next year in terms of the entire year, I’d basically repeat those numbers and say somewhere between 400,000 or maybe 500,000 again, depending on the timing.

Daniel Seyde: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: The next question comes from Andrew Reef, Private Investor. Andrew, please proceed.

Unidentified Analyst: Congratulations on making a profit this year, this quarter, I mean. Question I have is the general comics market has been declining in the direct market. Question would be is how much of the business is coming from outside of the book market, which is Random House and the direct market, which is combination. How much of it is coming from – as a one conglomerate international ordering directly from your own web store – or is there another market out there?

Andrew DeBaker: So I mean it sounds like just to be clear, you’re conflating the book market and the comic market with PRH as being just one distribution channel and you’re asking about all other distribution channels?

Unidentified Analyst: Right, exactly. Because you went up approximately $1 million, Jimmy, in total increased sales. And when I’m reading the ICv2, it indicates that the markets are not doing that well. So obviously, you’re doing better than the general market. And I was just curious how much of your business comes outside of that since you’ve had such a big increase in one quarter?

Andrew DeBaker: Yes. Andrew, I’ll let you jump in a more specificity, my rough number, I would say, is probably around 15%, maybe 20% – up to 20% outside of the PRH market? And in terms of diversifying our sales and distribution channels, focusing on direct-to-consumer, focusing on our applications, focusing on the digital market, vertical reading, other opportunities, whether it be Kickstarter or other distribution channels, those are all things that we’re looking at.

Unidentified Analyst: The reason for my question was to track it. I just figured I just have to track the sales of the top titles – top 200 that they publish in ICv2 and look at the book market results, I wanted to know, does that explain most of the story. So it explains about 85% of it. Is that the point?

Andrew DeBaker: Not necessarily…

Unidentified Analyst: What am I losing up in other words.

Davidi Jonas: I mean, part of it is that we had a good quarter, and a lot of that is in the Penguin Random House market. So even though the comics market generally might be down, we’re up year-over-year in the publishing business and the traditional…

Unidentified Analyst: That’s why I congratulated you.

Davidi Jonas: It’s not just that our direct-to-consumer business grew, which it did, it also is at a strong quarter. But Andrew, would you agree in terms of like the 15% to 20% range for non-PRH revenue?

Andrew DeBaker: Yes. So generally, PRH is roughly 80% or so. For Q3 – and obviously, it fluctuates. For Q3, it was actually 70%. So we did have a little bit more revenue from non-PRH. It’s mostly due for this quarter, mostly due to Scholastic orders, Scholastic book fairs. They generally place two orders a year, at least historically, one in sort of the June, July period and another one sort of in the October, November period. So in a large order from them comes through, obviously, that mix will change. But yes, generally in that sort of 80%, maybe 75% to 80% range is PRH.

Unidentified Analyst: Got it. And that’s due to Sonic and Teenage Ninja Turtles. Is that the primary source for Scholastic?

Andrew DeBaker: Yes.

Davidi Jonas: I don’t know if Scholastic ordered anything beyond Sonic and Turtles. But yes, those would be.

Unidentified Analyst: I just wanted to know because I could extrapolate that in the future, what that would be if you’re going up in your Random House and the other ones, then it should probably go up the same way…

Andrew DeBaker: Just sorry, I was just going to add that with Scholastic, clearly, we obviously are constantly going to them, trying to get them interested in other titles as well. So we would hope that in the future, they will move beyond Turtles in Sonic, but at the moment, that is the driver of that revenue, yes.

Unidentified Analyst: One quick question. Is the amount of revenue coming from Scholastic compared to the past years of Scholastic, is it dramatically up? Because I know that you guys used to have back in maybe 2019 something like $1 million of Scholastic revenue. Is this a new high for Scholastic as a customer?

Andrew DeBaker: Yes. Good question.

Davidi Jonas: I mean I don’t think it’s outstanding. I mean it might be – it might be higher, but it’s not the driver for the business.

Andrew DeBaker: Yes. I would say maybe year-over-year, fiscal year-to-date this year versus last year, we might be up about maybe 10% maybe 15%. But again, with Scholastic, the timing difference, right? So like one year, maybe they’ll place an order and we’ll get that into October. So we’ll get into the fiscal year. Other years, maybe it will be November depending on timing. So – it’s not always a strict year-over-year comparison.

Davidi Jonas: What’s very exciting is that in the listings that they show on comics hub, it shows that your product is selling through and it’s ranking in the top 3 or 2, Jimmy in terms of dollars. So – it’s not just that people are buying it, but that there is an enduring customer that buys the product, which is very exciting.

Q – Unidentified Analyst: Thank you.

Davidi Jonas: Thank you very much.

Unidentified Analyst: My pleasure. Thank you.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Paul Sunken, Private Investor. Please proceed.

Unidentified Analyst: Hi Davidi. So I guess one comment and then a couple of questions. One is I just want to express as I have in the e-mails that have sent you the appreciation for being shareholder-friendly and having these conference calls and continuing to disclose financials on a quarterly basis, I guess, there are companies that would go dark and never publish financials. And so I just wanted to express how appreciative we are.

Davidi Jonas: Thank you.

Unidentified Analyst: The other thing is it like you’ve worked through a lot of cost cutting. You’ve made a lot of changes over the past couple of years since you kind of took over from Alan – and do you feel as though the company is at kind of an inflection point like again, without giving guidance, do you anticipate losses? Or do you think the company is going to be profitable going forward, even if it’s breakeven?

Davidi Jonas: I feel like life is full of inflection points. So depending on where you want to pause the tape, I definitely think we’re at an inflection point. For me, the inflection point is the – as you pointed out, we’ve done a lot of the hard work of trying to right-size the business and the overhead and costs, et cetera. And at the same time, we really have done a pretty good job of locking down some of our key partnerships and licenses. I’d say the vast majority of our key partnerships and licenses. So I’d say the inflection point is like now we’ve got to push the gas. So does that mean that we’ll be profitable, I guess time will tell. We have as much of – as much of a prediction about what the weather will be in three months from now as anybody else. But our expectation is that if we continue on the path that we’re going down, that will be substantially profitable and hopefully, more so than we were in 2024.

Unidentified Analyst: So the other question, which kind of leads off that is like it’s not a kind of a typical turnarounds model would be shrink, fix and grow. And it seems as though you’ve been through the shrink and fix stages. And then I guess the question is, like I’d ask you this before, I guess, a couple of years ago, like so this is still consuming 100% of your time like in terms of your business activities?

Davidi Jonas: Yes. I’d say, if anything, it’s consuming more of my time personally now than it ever has. I think I’m probably as mentally unstable as they have been in a long time. So that’s certainly a correlation there. I’m just kidding.

Unidentified Analyst: I understand.

Davidi Jonas: Definitely taking up just about 100% of my time. In terms of the shrink, fix and grow, yes, I think we’ve sort of shrunk. I think we’ve done a lot of fixing. And in terms of growing, the way I think about it is like we have a bus and we have space for more passengers on the bus. Like we have the tool ready. We have the entire business set up, and we need to layer in additional opportunities for revenue growth for bottom line, high-value licenses as well as at the same time, we’re not just interested in the cash flow of the business. We’re also interested in the long-term shareholder value and creating value in the underlying IP. So taking some risks around co-creator, around new entrants, around wholly owned IP, so it may be some entertainment opportunities. So it’s a combination of putting more passengers on the bus and at the same time saying like, okay, now we have – now we have more stability in the business, that’s an opportunity for us to also invest in the long-term value of the IP.

Unidentified Analyst: So where are you spending a lot of your time or most of your time? And I guess I understand that like profitability short term may be compromised to invest in growth opportunities?

Davidi Jonas: That’s a good question. I tried to – I mean, I don’t know if you’re asking me personally or if you’re asking about the business.

Unidentified Analyst: Well, you, as it relates to the business. I mean, how many people work at the company now?

Davidi Jonas: About 50.

Unidentified Analyst: Okay. So I mean you’re running the show, so it’s really like – have – well, I guess, how you are positioning the company and what you were emphasizing for yourself and in turn the company?

Davidi Jonas: Yes. I mean it’s sort of a – like the way I think about the business is kind of having like two primary heads. One is the cash flow side of the business. And I’d say that’s primarily the license side of the business. And the other is the value opportunity, and that’s kind of the co-creator and original IP and that franchise extension and entertainment and all the things that kind of extend further out. I’d say like I try to find the biggest problem that – I shouldn’t call them problems, the biggest areas that need to be addressed and spend ample time on them to get them set up for future stability and then go on to the next issue. So like – and at the same time, I’m also doing in a given day, I might be dealing with three or four issues on either side of the fence. So in terms of me personally, I’m thinking about how to do – how to extend our franchises, whether that’s selling bourbon whiskey or thinking about other ways that we can extend franchises, whether that be tabletop games, board games, podcast, conferences, sneakers, whatever it is, to get fans exciting opportunities to engage with the franchises that they love, that might be taking up so much of my time. And then on the other side, I’m thinking about what are the next licenses that we should be focused on, how do we put more passengers on the bus and then going out and trying to land those deals and land those next opportunities. So I’d say it’s kind of right brain, left brain, but trying to make sure that each site is getting the adequate amount of time and focus to be able to deliver.

Unidentified Analyst: Got you. And then my last question, which is kind of a more technical question, I apologize because I don’t have – I’m out of the office, so I don’t have my – the filing in front of me. But I was curious about the vesting schedule for the options. Like I wasn’t sure if they invested over time because I knew that there were some market cap thresholds. So I didn’t know if both of those had to be met or – and I read through it a couple of times, and I was just a little confused.

Davidi Jonas: No. I think in terms of divesting, if I’m not mistaken, divesting is related to the maybe it is dual, but it’s mostly – as far as investors are concerned, I think it’s mostly related to the success for tax reasons, part of it is in terms of it being treated as ISOs and that are just typical options. There’s only a certain amount that could be – that could divest in a given year. So that’s why – that’s part of the reason I divest over such a long period of time.

Unidentified Analyst: Okay. So it’s primarily related to market cap. And then I know I asked you this before, but I just ask again, like the target seem to be incredibly high, which would apply you on. But I was curious about kind of why that decision was made – because I think it’s like $25 million, $50 million.

Davidi Jonas: And $110 million. Yes. I do think that the targets at the time that they were set were based on an expectation on that moment in time. And I think that the reality is that the lack of liquidity in the stock, the lack of interest, the – we’ve had a pretty good year relative to the past five years for IDW. I mean this is a very good year and there’s also more cash in the bank, and the market hasn’t really reflected that kind of a turnaround. So I do think that there’s – like at the time that the Board set those targets, I think there was more of an expectation of a more engaged marketplace and that would be more impacted by news and that hasn’t been the case.

Unidentified Analyst: I can almost guarantee that the more backing and cash flow that you produce, the higher the stock will go. So it will take care of itself.

Davidi Jonas: Yes. No, like I said, I think there’s the two sides of that — of the two heads of the monster, the cash flow. And I think we can hopefully keep layering profitability. And the real upside for the business is not going to be an incremental $1 million or $2 million or $3 million of profitability because there’s no real value in that profit, like it’s just the cash because we don’t own the Ninja Turtles, we don’t own Sonic. And if those licenses don’t get renewed, which they’re not guaranteed to – so in terms of the value for the IP, that’s really where the long-term opportunity is. And I’d say the market is almost 100% discounting, I shouldn’t say almost. I mean like I think, negatively discounting that possibility. I would say that the market is, in my estimation, is estimating a negative value to the future exploitation of licenses just based on liquidation value and the current market cap.

Unidentified Analyst: Well, there are people out, they are like me who were willing to provide liquidity, if anybody wants to get out.

Davidi Jonas: Thank you.

Unidentified Analyst: And when they’re ready to buy, we’ll provide liquidity for them to get in.

Davidi Jonas: I hope that efficiently answers your questions.

Unidentified Analyst: Yes. Thank you very much.

Davidi Jonas: Pleasure.

Operator: Okay. We have a follow-up coming from Daniel Seyde with SpruceLine Capital. Please proceed.

Daniel Seyde: Hi. What does IDW plan to do with the $3 million of capital that was recently raised?

Davidi Jonas: So it was raised through strategic purposes and also just kind of as a backstop. So as the backstop, it’s obviously going to continue to function as a source of security for the company. We have a material amount of our cash balance invested into secure and highly liquid market assets, just to be able to provide some value while it’s sitting, but it’s there for opportunities, whether it be a new license, no opportunities for the business. I can say personally, having $7 million in the bank versus just a little over $3 million, there’s a lot more confidence to take healthy calculated risk knowing that we have that much cash in the bank.

Daniel Seyde: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. There are currently no questions in queue. I’d like to turn the floor back to management for any closing remarks.

Davidi Jonas: Thank you very much, John. Thank you, everyone, for joining. This is – I think our most robust conversation with investors yet, and I hope that will continue. We welcome questions and engagement and look forward to our next quarterly update. Thank you, everyone, and have a good day.

Operator: Thank you. This concludes today’s conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.